Universal's $2 million 1927 production was the last American film version of Uncle Tom's Cabin. M-G-M considered remaking the movie in 1946, but a protest from the N.A.A.C.P. halted the project.* In 1958 an abridged version of the Universal film, with voice-over narration by Raymond Massey, was unsuccessfully released (in part, apparently, in response to a re-release of D. W. Griffith's Birth of a Nation). In 1969 a version was made in Germany with a pan-European cast, and briefly released into American theaters. In 1987 Showtime produced a made-for-TV version, with Avery Brooks as Uncle Tom, Samuel L. Jackson as George Harris and Phylicia Rashad as Eliza. Eighty years after the Universal film, it seems less likely than ever that Hollywood will remake Uncle Tom, but under other names and guises, Uncle Tom himself, the character Stowe created over a century and a half ago, remains a staple of the film industry. |
"Not while Mas'r is in trouble," said Tom. "I'll stay with Mas'r as long as he wants me,--so as I can be of any use." (Chapter 28) |
TOM PRAYING FOR HIS MAS'R TO SEE ENTIRE IMAGE CLICK HERE 1925 PULLMAN PORTERS' UNION CARTOON ENTIRE IMAGE 1945 BILLBOARD ARTICLE ENTIRE ARTICLE |
In Flight to Canada (1976), Ishmael Reed's revisionary
send up of Stowe's novel, one moment shines a brilliant light on the cultural
power of the figure of Uncle Tom. Raven Quickskill, a fugitive slave, has been caught
by the two Tracers his master hired to bring him back to slavery. Quickskill notices
one of the men has a cold, and offers to get him some vitamin C from the
bathroom. While the men look over a copy of Uncle Tom's Cabin -- "I
hear [Stowe] made a pile on this book," one says -- he goes into the bathroom
and out the window, recovering his freedom.* The Tracers would not normally let Quickskill out of their sight, but they
can believe a black man would be more concerned about a white man's cold than the threat to his own
liberty. As far-fetched as this notion might sound, Reed really didn't have to go very far to find it.
Right there in the novel the Tracers are looking at is the scene in Chapter 28, for example, in which Tom tells St.
Clare that even if St. Clare frees him, his freedom and family can wait until "mas'r" has no further use
for him: "I'll stay as long as Mas'r is in trouble." St. Clare's "trouble" is spiritual. The vitamin Tom provides is his great spirituality, which paradoxically is the result of his extraordinary deprivation. After he was sold, he tells St. Clare one chapter earlier, "I felt as if there weren't nothin' left." Out of this suffering comes his faith -- "I's so happy, and loves everybody, and feels willin' jest to be the Lord's" -- and this faith he makes available to the white man who has lost his child: "I know He's willin' to do [the same] for Mas'r." In fact, St. Clare is saved by Tom -- though Tom is never freed by St. Clare. In the novel Tom is not an "Uncle Tom," which the dictionary defines as a black person who abjectly sells out the interests of his race to curry favor with the white power structure. Malcolm X's speeches and his Autobiography are probably most directly responsible for giving the term the rhetorical force it has today. As far as I've been able to discover, this idea of "an Uncle Tom" first emerges during the years immediately after World War I. Beginning in 1919, Marcus Garvey and his followers made "Uncle Tom is dead" one of the slogans of their nationalist movement. In the mid-1920s, the campaign that A. Philip Randolph led to unionize the Pullman porters repeatedly stigmatized those who opposed them as "Uncle Toms" serving the bosses. (The archive contains a SECTION with examples of these early 20th century texts and images.) It's not clear to me how this usage came about. In the novel Tom never betrays other blacks. The first time Simon Legree whips him, it's because Tom will not obey the order to whip Lucy, and Legree beats him to death because Tom will not reveal where Cassy and Emmeline are hiding. |
On the other hand, Tom is very willing to sacrifice himself to help others,
white or black. Stowe would call this "Christian," and in theory sets it up as the ideal everyone
should aspire to. Eva, for example, is equally selfless when she tells Tom "I would be glad to die,
if my dying could stop all this misery" caused by slavery. But I propose to call what
Tom winds up doing in the novel "Tomming" -- a term I'm borrowing from the actors who
dramatized the novel to call attention to the fundamental perverseness of Stowe's narrative. As she
wrote in her 1878
INTRODUCTION, Stowe began the novel with a vision of a black man dying in
agony on a southern plantation, and wrote it, of course, to urge white readers to help black slaves.
But when Tom gets to the St. Clare household in the story's middle section, the narrative emphasis
shifts, though Stowe and her readers were probably unconscious of the change:
while Tom never stops wanting to be free and reunited with his family, he comes to seem even more
anxious to help the whiter characters, even the ones who "own" him, with the burdens of their
lives. |
|
TOM TELLS ST. CLARE GOD WILL EASE HIS PAIN ENTIRE IMAGE |
He saves Eva from drowning, but far more importantly teaches her about religion.
He saves St. Clare from alcohol, and then, far more importantly, after Eva's death leaves St. Clare
"bitter" and even more estranged from the faith his dead mother had tried to teach him, Tom saves his
soul too. This pattern is repeated again at Legree's, where the "bitter" character is Cassy. Tom is
beaten for the first time in Chapter 33. The next chapter, "The Quadroon's Story," begins with Cassy
ministering to his bruised body, but as the chapter title suggests, it quickly turns from Tom's
suffering to hers, and ends up with him ministering to her broken heart and aching soul. And what
happens in this one chapter -- that Tom's pain turns out to be the source of his ability to heal
someone else, whose sufferings command more of the narrative's and the reader's attention -- is what I
think happens at large in Uncle Tom's Cabin. In this story, paradoxically, it is the "lowly"
and disenfranchised black man's role to free others from their sorrows. Stowe did make a lot of money from the novel. It was so popular, I suspect, in large part because of the way Stowe, even as she makes her powerful case against the institution of slavery, winds up scripting a racial fantasy in which the black man remains, willingly, in such a subservient position, raising up someone else with the resources that have been nurtured in the depths of his own suffering. Such a narrative not only legitimizes the black man's deprivation, and so saves white America from feeling responsible or guilty about the socio-economic hardships blacks have faced; it makes that "blackness" available to white Americans while maintaining their privileged position as the group whose lives really matter. |
"Mas'r always found me on the spot--he always will." (Chapter 5) |
It would be nice to think this racial fantasy disappeared when slavery was abolished, but in fact it is still one of American culture's favorite stories. For example, Hollywood hasn't tried to make Stowe's novel into a feature film since the mid-1940s, when an NAACP protest led MGM to cancel plans for a new Uncle Tom's Cabin. But under other names, "Tom" has played the part I'm describing here in countless movies. I've gathered clips from a few of the most recent examples together in this exhibit, along with a couple earlier instances of Tomming that make the pattern a bit easier to see. You can view the clips by clicking on the images. If you don't have a QuickTime Player, at the bottom of this page there's a link to the site where you can download it. |
St. Clare said again to Tom, more earnestly, "Pray!" And Tom did pray, with all his mind and strength, for the soul that was passing,--the soul that seemed looking so steadily and mournfully from those large, melancholy blue eyes. (Chapter 28) |
When Stowe winds up defining Tom's role as savior to the whiter characters, she helps fix
the "right" place for the black man in the white imagination as firmly as slavery did. Even though Tom,
Walker and the crows are the "lowliest" characters in their stories -- Dumbo, for example, sees no
irony when the mouse tells the crows, with their ridiculous outfits and dialect, that the worst thing is that
Dumbo has been turned into a clown -- they are the ones who have what the main character needs, and they are
expected to provide that "help" without any concern for themselves. The main characters only come into
contact with "blackness" when they've fallen into some kind of personal darkness. It's in that darkness that
the black characters live, and out of which they can lift the white character. Once that white character has
been saved in this way, the black characters must be left behind. When we look at Uncle Tom's Cabin or movies from half a century ago, it's easy to see the stereotyping involved in this Tomming scenario. Tom on his knees, Walker's ingratiating smile, the mindless laughter of the crows -- contemporary story-telling could never use such crude caricatures. But while it's harder to see the ideological assumptions that underlie our own cultural moment, now that we've established the Tomming motif, I hope you'll recognize it again and again in the following clips, from very recent movies. I can't apologize for the repetitiousness of what follows. The fault lies in our collective failure to imagine a different role for the black man than the one Stowe popularized over 150 years ago. |
Tom looked up to [Legree], and answered, "Mas'r, if you was sick,
or in trouble, or dying, and I could save ye, I'd give ye my heart's blood." (Chapter 41) |
Bulworth (1998)WRITTEN & DIRECTED BY WARREN BEATTY Of all the films in this exhibit, Beatty's is the most like Stowe's novel in the way its racial good intentions are tangled up in racist projections and stereotypes. In his comments about the film, Beatty repeatedly and sincerely said he made it to dramatize the plight of the black inner city. But just as Stowe was finally most deeply invested in St. Clare and Cassy's grief as parents who have lost children, so Beatty's central concern is the way aging has unmanned Senator Jay Bulworth. The opening credits (left) depict him attempting to watch a re-election campaign commercial through the tears he sheds for himself. Believing he has nothing to lose, Bulworth's rebirth begins when he decides to tell the truth about the power of corporate money in American politics to an audience in a black urban church. From that point on he descends more and more deeply into "blackness," exchanging his suit for the costume of a gangsta rapper, and (as you can hear in the clip at left) his bland rhetoric for the insistent rhymes and "obscenities" of rap. What we are meant to hear in the clip is the repressed truth about how hard black Americans' lives are, but at the same time it's easy to hear how empowering the white Senator finds the "blackface" he's wearing. The previous clip ends with the image of real black males looking impressed with Bulworth's protest against the inequalities they live with. But as you might expect, solving the problem of one's impotency by "becoming black" ultimately depends on sex. That's where Halle Berry comes in, playing Nina, a resident of South Central who is originally hired to assassinate Bulworth but ends up falling in love with him. He takes off the gangsta outfit, but when she anoints him as her black man his story reaches its happy ending (here). Right after Bulworth kisses Nina, he is assassinated by one of the flunkeys of corporate privilege. The image at left isn't a link to a clip, because in a sense this one image already says too much to sum up. Visually, the scene echoes the famous news photograph of Martin Luther King's assassination (COMPARE IMAGES). Shocking as this appropriation is, the film's reviewers don't seem to have noticed it, perhaps because of all the racial borrowing that has already gone on. In this story the "black man" who saves Bulworth is the one he himself becomes, temporarily. Of course, nothing has changed for the real blacks who live in the South Central "hood" that Bulworth descends into. Ultimately it's easier for Beatty to martyr Bulworth than to take the story one step further in the direction of the social change that King died for. |
"It's time we realized discrimination in the past doesn't justify discrimination in the future." (Sen. J. Billington Bulworth) |
ENLARGE |
PLAY |
PLAY |
We can end with three endings, three scenes of goodby from 1853, 1941 and 2000 -- (above left): The last of the 115 pictures Billings drew for the "Illustrated Edition" of Stowe's novel, showing freed slaves disappearing in the direction of Africa, leaving America free of both slavery and black people; (center): The very end of Dumbo, showing the black crows being left behind, but grateful for the role they were allowed to play in the story of Dumbo's rise to fame and wealth; (right): Bigger Vance disappearing into the sunset as Junuh sinks the crucial putt back at the all-white country club. When will we finally see the last of the Tomming archetype itself? I wouldn't like to predict. But I can suggest how we'll be able to tell when this fantasy has lost its hold on the white American imagination: when we can watch an inverted form of it, when the places of black and white in the scheme become interchangeable, when audiences will accept just as easily a story in which a black man uses a scene of white suffering comparable to slavery or segregation as the site of his personal renewal, when the white characters are willing to devote themselves wholly to his healing and are happy to be left behind with their hardships as he goes off to live happily ever after. |